Tag: Constitutional Law
-
Supreme Court questions Trump claim he can fire Fed governors by fiat
Supreme Court Doubts Trump’s Claim to Fire Fed Governors by Fiat The Supreme Court appeared skeptical on Wednesday of President Donald Trump’s assertion that he could immediately remove Federal Reserve governors by fiat. In a high-stakes argument that extended for more than two hours, all nine justices weighed the limits of executive power against the…
-
Supreme Court Doubts Trump’s Authority to Fire Fed Governors by Fiat
High Court Questions Presidential Authority Over Federal Reserve Appointments The Supreme Court signaled serious doubt on President Trump’s claim that he can immediately remove members of the Federal Reserve’s governing board by executive fiat. In a marathon session that stretched over more than two hours, all nine justices from across the ideological spectrum pressed both…
-
Showdown Over Federal Reserve Independence: Supreme Court Hears High-Stakes Case
What’s at stake in the Supreme Court case? The U.S. Supreme Court is set to hear arguments on a case that could redefine how independent the Federal Reserve Board operates and how presidential removals of board members are handled under U.S. constitutional law. At the heart of the dispute is President Trump’s attempt to remove…
-
Independence at Stake: Supreme Court Weighs Fed Case as Markets React
Overview: A Case That Could Redraw the Fed’s Boundaries The U.S. Supreme Court takes up a high-stakes dispute on Wednesday that has rattled Wall Street and unsettled financial markets. At the heart of the controversy is the Trump administration’s attempt to challenge a long-standing framework governing the Federal Reserve’s independence. The case centers on whether…
-
Judicial Independence in Namibia: Safeguards, Capacity, and Public Trust
Introduction: Why Judicial Independence Matters Judicial independence is a cornerstone of Namibia’s rule of law. It ensures that courts decide cases without improper influence, enabling fair outcomes and protecting fundamental rights. Recent public statements have raised questions about the competence and independence of Namibia’s judges. This article outlines the safeguards in place to maintain both…
-
Supreme Court tackles Hawaii’s ‘vampire rule’ for gun owners
Overview: The case and the so-called ‘vampire rule’ The Supreme Court is examining a high-stakes challenge to a Hawaii gun restriction that has drawn attention for its notorious nickname: the “vampire rule.” Critics say the rule effectively bans everyday firearm possession by requiring permit holders to repeatedly renew or seek permission in a manner that…
-
Zimbabwe’s Chief Justice Malaba to Retire in May, Ending a Controversial Tenure
Overview: A Long Tenure Concludes Chief Justice Luke Malaba will retire on May 15, 2026, marking the end of a 15-year stint at the helm of Zimbabwe’s judiciary. His career has spanned landmark decisions, constitutional disputes, and a period of intense political and legal scrutiny. In a formal statement released on January 17, 2026, the…
-
Zimbabwe’s Chief Justice Luke Malaba to Retire as JSC Closes Controversial Chapter
Introduction: The looming retirement of a controversial icon Zimbabwe’s judiciary is preparing for a milestone moment as Chief Justice Luke Malaba announces his retirement, effective May 15, 2026. After a decades-long career that saw him ascend to the apex of the country’s legal system, Malaba’s tenure has been the subject of intense public debate. Supporters…
-
Chief Justice Luke Malaba Retirement: A Turning Point for Zimbabwe’s Judiciary
Overview: A Long Tenure Comes to a Close Chief Justice Luke Malaba will retire on May 15, 2026, ending a judicial career that has been both steadfast and contentious. Appointed to the bench in 2001 and elevated to Zimbabwe’s top judicial post in 2017, Malaba led the judiciary through a period of intense political and…
-
Malaysia’s Constitutional Duty to Prevent Statelessness: From Jus Soli to Jus Sanguinis
Introduction: Why Malaysia’s Citizenship matters Statelessness affects millions around the world, and Malaysia is no exception. Central to this issue is how a country defines who counts as a citizen. In 1962, Malaysia’s Parliament enacted a sweeping set of amendments to the Constitution that redefined citizenship rules. The changes signaled a move away from jus…