Former Prime Minister John Major Calls Brexit a Collective Folly
A former Conservative prime minister has labelled Brexit “an act of collective folly,” delivering one of the sternest public rebukes of the decision to leave the European Union. In a wide-ranging critique, John Major argued that the UK’s exit from the bloc has produced unintended consequences for the country’s economy, international standing, and political unity.
Major’s remarks arrived as the political landscape continues to grapple with the long-term effects of Brexit. He asserted that Britain’s enemies celebrated while its friends despaired at the rupture in centuries-old European ties, a sentiment that underscores the perceived damage to the UK’s diplomatic leverage and economic prospects. The former prime minister’s critique is notable for its blunt tone from a leading figure within the Conservative Party, historically associated with cautious governance and a pragmatic approach to European affairs.
The Core of Major’s Critique
In outlining why Brexit represents a “collective folly,” Major highlighted several threads that have defined the post-referendum era. He argued that the decision, taken in a highly charged political climate, was not accompanied by a robust plan for managing the consequences, from trade frictions to regulatory divergence. Critics of the Brexit project, echoing Major’s concerns, say that the country has spent years negotiating new relationships with the EU while facing supply-chain disruptions and bureaucratic hurdles that hinder business confidence and investment.
Major’s assessment goes beyond economic metrics. He warned of the long-term impact on political cohesion within the United Kingdom, noting that the Brexit bloc’s fracturing prompted new conversations about sovereignty, devolution, and the future of the union. The former PM implied that systemic challenges are piling up as the UK negotiates new trade deals, navigates regulatory alignment, and responds to shifts in global alliances. His words add a somber voice to a debate that has consumed Westminster for years.
Implications for the Economy and International Standing
Economically, critics of Brexit have pointed to persistent borders, customs checks, and imperfect supply chains as price tags of the decision. Major argued that the public and private sectors have shouldered higher costs and uncertainty, particularly for industries with close links to European markets. While proponents have cited renewed opportunities in global trade and regulatory freedom, Major’s critique centers on the balance of risks and benefits and whether the country is reaping the anticipated gains.
On the international stage, Major suggested that Brexit reshaped Britain’s relationships with allies and rivals alike. If friends despaired at the outcome, some observers argue, that perception has translated into weaker influence within critical forums, such as the G7, NATO, and other multilateral institutions. Major’s commentary invites a broader reflection on how Britain projects its interests after leaving the EU and how it can rebuild collaborative ties that once underpinned its global strategy.
What This Means for the Tory Party and UK Politics
As a veteran figure within the Conservative Party, Major’s remarks carry political weight and influence the ongoing debate about the UK’s post-Brexit path. The comments serve as a reminder that Brexit remains a contested legacy within the party, with activists and lawmakers divided over its merits and long-term direction. For supporters of Brexit, Major’s words may be viewed as an attempt to reframe the conversation around national identity, sovereignty, and future opportunities. For critics, they reinforce the argument that the decision required more preparation and a clearer, more credible plan to manage its fallout.
Overall, Major’s assessment positions Brexit as a defining, contentious moment in modern British history — a moment that continues to shape political strategies, policy choices, and public sentiment. As the country navigates its post-Brexit reality, commentators and policymakers will likely revisit Major’s warnings, weighing them against evolving economic data and the UK’s ongoing pursuit of trade partnerships around the world.
Looking Ahead
With the UK’s relationship with Europe evolving and the global economy facing its own pressures, the conversation around Brexit’s value and cost remains unsettled. John Major’s framework — identifying both the spectral opportunities and real risks — could influence future Conservative Party debates, party reform, and how future leaders articulate the UK’s place in Europe and the wider world.
