Overview: STAR’s Departure Marks a New Phase in Sabah’s Politics
The departure of Parti Solidariti Tanah Airku (STAR) from Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) on 2 October 2025 signals more than a routine reshuffle in Sabah’s coalitions. It reflects a broader pattern of realignments across Malaysia’s eastern states, where local issues, leadership dynamics, and electoral calculations are driving smaller parties to reconsider their pacts. With the exit occurring just five days before the dissolution deadline, analysts say the move could trigger a cascade of adjustments as parties scramble to preserve influence and maintain voter trust.
What Triggered the Split?
Several factors appear to have contributed to STAR’s decision to part ways with GRS. Internal leadership tensions, disagreements over developmental priorities for Sabah’s rural areas, and divergent views on how to approach federal collaboration have all been cited by political observers. Additionally, STAR’s strategic calculus likely weighed the potential gains from running independently or with new partners against remaining in a coalition that, in practice, may no longer deliver the local traction STAR seeks ahead of elections.
Stakeholder Perspectives
For STAR supporters, the split is framed as a chance to assert a distinct Sabah-centric platform. Advocates argue that STAR can leverage its local base to push for targeted programs in agriculture, infrastructure, and education—priorities they believe have been underserved by the coalition’s past governance. Critics, however, warn that leaving a stable coalition could complicate STAR’s ability to secure funding and influence at both state and federal levels, potentially weakening Sabah’s bargaining power in the short term.
Implications for GRS and the Political Landscape
GRS, already navigating the complex dynamics of Sabah’s multi-party scene, now faces a recalibration. The exit reduces STAR’s anchors within the coalition and forces GRS to rethink its legislative arithmetic. Coalition partners must reassess alliances, donor bases, and campaign messaging as they prepare for the upcoming political cycle. In practical terms, the move may open space for other local parties to position themselves as credible alternatives, potentially reshaping voter loyalties in districts where STAR once held sway.
Electoral Consequences and Voter Sentiment
Ultimately, Sabah voters will weigh STAR’s exit against the practical outcomes of the coalition realignment. If STAR delivers a clear, issue-focused platform that resonates with rural communities, it could attract new support even outside its existing base. Conversely, if the party struggles to articulate a coherent path forward after leaving GRS, voters may view the split as a political tactic rather than a principled repositioning. The coming months will reveal whether the break translates into ballots or into another round of posturing among Sabah’s political elites.
What Happens Next for STAR and GRS?
For STAR, the path forward will involve defining a standalone policy agenda, securing coalition-friendly partners, and building a sustainable funding model. The party will need to demonstrate continuity in its development programs while presenting a compelling rationale for voters to back a different political arrangement. For GRS, the challenge is to maintain governance stability, shore up regional development commitments, and preserve momentum in provinces where STAR had been a key voice. Coalition leadership will likely focus on messaging that emphasizes continuity and pragmatic governance while signaling openness to new alliances that can strengthen Sabah’s position in state and federal arenas.
Conclusion: A Turning Point with Long-Term Potential
Sabah’s political calendar is entering a critical phase. STAR’s exit from GRS could be a catalyst for stronger regional accountability and more nuanced policy debates about Sabah’s priorities. While uncertainty may accompany any major realignment, the outcome also holds the potential for revitalizing Sabah’s political ecosystem by giving voters clearer choices, sharper platforms, and a renewed focus on local development.
