Ombudsman Signals Imminent Consequences for the Discaya Spouses
Ombudsman Jesus Crispin C. Remulla has issued a stark warning to contractor spouses Curlee and Sarah Discaya amid investigations into ghost and substandard flood-control projects in the Philippines. Speaking on the radio program Saksi sa Dobol B, Remulla asserted that the couple must confront the likelihood of imprisonment, even as they have chosen to discontinue cooperation with the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) on its inquiry.
The Discaya spouses—owners of Alpha and Omega Construction and St. Gerrard Construction Corporation—recently declined to continue serving as state witnesses. Remulla, however, stressed that their decision does not halt or slow the broader investigative work being conducted by his office. He emphasized that the probe would proceed with or without their participation and that other witnesses remain to be heard.
Possible Paths: Plea Bargaining, Restitution, and Immunity
Remulla outlined two potential avenues for the Discayas as the case moves forward. They could enter into a plea bargaining agreement with the government, effectively pleading guilty to lesser offenses in exchange for a reduced sentence. Alternatively, they could opt for a strategy of “complete restitution and tell-all,” in the hopes of achieving exceptional immunity.
To illustrate the gravity of plea bargaining, the Ombudsman recalled the case of retired Maj. Gen. Carlos F. Garcia, a former AFP comptroller who struck a plea deal to escape harsher plunder and money-laundering charges. Garcia pleaded guilty to lesser offenses, resulting in a sentence of four to eight years for direct bribery and related penalties, though the full financial and legal repercussions were extensive.
What the Discayas Have Said and the Government’s Next Steps
Remulla noted that the Discaya couple has remained deliberately “selective” about what they disclose to investigators. There were pointed questions about their dealings with CLTG Builders in Davao City, with the couple reportedly claiming they did not know specifics and that their company licenses were merely used in projects, not as controllers of the work themselves.
Despite their stance, the Ombudsman underscored a resolve to continue the anti-corruption campaign and to hold all parties to account. He asserted that the Discayas are not the only witnesses in the flood-control mess and that their possible testimony (or lack thereof) would not derail the ongoing inquiry. The government’s obligation is to pursue truth, irrespective of individual co-operation.
Implications for Governance and Public Trust
The unfolding statements from the Ombudsman reflect a broader emphasis on accountability in public works. Flood-control projects are critical in safeguarding communities from natural disasters, and lapses in oversight can erode public trust and result in costly, unsafe infrastructure. By signaling that high-profile figures could face imprisonment, Remulla aims to reinforce that the rule of law applies evenly to everyone, including well-connected contractors.
Looking Ahead
As the investigation advances, observers will watch closely for new charges, plea agreements, and any restatements of facts by the Discaya spouses. The balance between cooperation, legal strategy, and accountability will shape both the legal proceedings and the broader public conversation about integrity in infrastructure projects.
The case continues to unfold, with the Ombudsman’s office reiterating its commitment to pursuing truth and ensuring that governance standards are upheld for the safety and welfare of Filipino communities.
