Starmer signals tougher stance on protest rules
Prime Minister Keir Starmer has signaled a broadening of the government’s approach to protests, instructing the home secretary to explore additional powers that could curb inflammatory chants at pro-Palestinian demonstrations. The push comes as Labour seeks to balance public order with civil liberties, following calls to address the perceived impact of repeat protests in key locations.
What is being proposed?
Under the current thinking, police would assess the “cumulative impact” of protests and could reroute demonstrations or bar them altogether if disruption is deemed excessive. The emphasis, however, is expanding beyond the measures already outlined by Shabana Mahmood, with discussions about tightening controls on chants that could incite violence or hatred.
Chants in the spotlight
Chants such as “globalise the intifada” and other inflammatory slogans have triggered debate about the line between free expression and calls to violence. Starmer acknowledged that a minority on pro-Gaza marches has crossed into antisemitic territory, arguing that public order powers should be examined to address such conduct without infringing lawful protest.
Public order powers under review
The government is considering a broad review of existing public order powers across Whitehall, including police techniques to manage demonstrations held at the same site on multiple occasions. Possible options include limiting numbers, setting time restrictions, or instructing organisers to move events. These potential changes would modify sections 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act 1986, which currently carries penalties that include imprisonment and fines for breaches.
Reaction from civil liberties groups
Rights advocates have warned that expanding restrictions could chill lawful protest and hinder democratic expression. They argue that any new powers must be carefully balanced with the right to assemble and speak freely. The debate intensified after a terror attack targeting a Manchester synagogue, which has intensified calls for action against chants that could provoke violence.
Engagement with the Jewish community and MPs
Starmer has stressed ongoing dialogue with Jewish community leaders as part of the review, noting that security for Jewish institutions remains a priority. He also indicated that forces themselves might need to adapt how they enforce existing rules, with a view to ensuring robust protection without overreach.
Political context and next steps
Labour’s position reflects a broader political conversation about public safety, anti-Semitism, and the boundaries of peaceful protest. Mahmood and Starmer have urged organisers not to proceed with protests planned for the evening of the attack on the synagogue, as well as demonstrations anticipated around the Hamas attack anniversary. The government says the changes will be implemented through targeted amendments to existing law, with a clear emphasis on safeguarding lives while preserving civil liberties.
What happens next?
The home secretary and other ministers will continue the consultation, with a series of actions to be agreed in due course. Civil society groups, police unions, and community leaders will weigh in as the government finalizes new procedures designed to deter violence and antisemitic rhetoric while upholding the right to protest.
