A-forming a unique collaboration from the start
Ismail Darbar and Sanjay Leela Bhansali built a distinctive working relationship right from their early projects. In discussing Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam, Darbar emphasized his willingness to challenge ideas and articulate his own musical vision. He explained that disagreements were a natural part of the creative process and that he would speak up when a proposed sound or melody didn’t align with his artistic instincts. This openness set the foundation for a partnership that once felt unusually collaborative, even when push came to shove on specific creative choices.
The Heeramandi chapter and a rising tension
Darbar’s journey with Bhansali continued through the web series Heeramandi, where he spent about a year and a half crafting the music with dedication. Despite a strong personal bond and a long history of collaboration, a rift emerged around how media coverage portrayed their roles. A prominent article described Darbar as the “backbone” of Heeramandi, underscoring his role as a driving musical force behind the project. Bhansali’s reaction to that piece became a turning point in their relationship, as he allegedly believed Darbar had orchestrated the exposure, which led to a public and private strain between the two artists.
The confrontation that signaled a break
Darbar recounts a direct confrontation that underscored the growing distance. After the media piece circulated, Bhansali summoned him to the office and questioned how he could have said such things. Darbar claims that, while Bhansali urged him to “let it go,” the friction had already taken root. He felt that Bhansali’s ego and fear of losing creative control were growing factors, prompting him to leave Heeramandi before the project could push him further away. Darbar asserts that he had been the backbone in key projects like Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam and Devdas, and he perceived Bhansali’s protectiveness of credit as ego-driven rather than a shared artistic victory.
Why the fallout isn’t about money, but recognition
Over the years, Darbar has made clear that the strain wasn’t merely about collaboration on a single score. He has expressed a belief that his own contributions elevated the music and, by extension, the project’s potential to endure in memory. He cites his work as a crucial factor in Heeramandi’s musical identity and implies that Bhansali’s later choices didn’t fully capture what he could have achieved. This perspective frames the fallout as a clash over artistic recognition and creative autonomy as much as any logistical dispute.
The unexpected twist: a potential Rs 100 crore test
In a striking remark about future possibilities, Darbar said that if Bhansali offered to hire him for Rs 100 crore today, he would reject the offer outright. His statement signals a definitive boundary and a warning that their professional paths may not cross again. For fans and industry observers, it highlights a broader conversation about how long-standing collaborations evolve when personal dynamics, egos, and professional ambitions collide.
What this means for Heeramandi and Indian cinema
Darbar’s account adds a complex layer to Heeramandi’s behind-the-scenes narrative. It underscores how music can define a project’s emotional core, while also illustrating how personal tensions can shape, or even derail, creative directions. For listeners and viewers, the exchange invites a renewed appreciation for the music that Darbar contributed and compels a closer look at the balance of power, credit, and collaboration in Indian cinema.
Key takeaways
- Creative clashes can coexist with deep professional respect in long-running collaborations.
- Media narratives can impact real-world relationships in the industry.
- Artistic recognition and autonomy often sit at the heart of creative disputes.
Follow us for more behind-the-scenes insights into the music and movie-making world.
