Lawmakers consider a special session to fast–track ICI expansion
Caloocan Representative Edgar Erice has called for a special session of the House of Representatives if needed to pass House Bill No. 4453, a measure that would strengthen the Independent Commission on Infrastructure (ICI). The bill would grant the ICI contempt powers and expanded subpoena authority as it investigates flood-control projects linked to government infrastructure spending.
Erice’s remarks come as Congress sits in session until October 13, 2025, before its next break. In a privilege speech, he urged fellow lawmakers to persuade President Ferdinand Marcos Jr. to certify the bill as urgent. An urgent certification would allow the House and Senate to approve the measure on second and third readings on the same day, accelerating its passage.
Why the ICI needs stronger powers
The ICI was created by Executive Order No. 94 to independently investigate irregularities in government flood-control projects. While empowered to conduct hearings, take testimony, and gather evidence, the commission does not currently possess prosecutorial or contempt powers. Critics say this limits its effectiveness and could erode public trust in anti-corruption efforts.
Erice highlighted concerns from within the ICI itself, noting that a member reportedly expressed fatigue and the possibility of resignation due to the commission’s limited authority. He quoted that without contempt powers, the ICI might be relegated to a supporting role, with some suggesting that bodies like the NBI or the Ombudsman would be better positioned to handle investigations.
“If this goes on, the public won’t be able to trust the ICI,” Erice said. He quoted the ICI member as saying the commission should have contempt powers rather than rely solely on other agencies for enforcement actions.
What HB 4453 would change
The proposed measure would expand the ICI’s tools to hold witnesses and involved parties accountable. Contempt powers would enable the commission to compel compliance and enforce findings, while broader subpoena authority would facilitate gathering critical documents and testimony. Proponents argue that these powers are essential for a comprehensive and credible investigation into potential irregularities in flood-control investments.
Supporters emphasize that strengthening the ICI aligns with the President’s intent to create independent bodies that oversee infrastructure projects with integrity. Erice underscored that the ICI’s work is for the people and the nation’s future, urging swift action to give the commission the authority it needs.
Next steps and political context
If the bill is certified as urgent, leadership could fast–track its passage, potentially shortening the usual process. Some observers note that a special session may be necessary to resolve any remaining procedural hurdles and secure timely approval for the strengthened ICI framework.
GMA News Online has reached out to the ICI for comment, illustrating the ongoing public interest in how government agencies oversee infrastructure projects and manage accountability in flood-control programs.
Context on the ICI’s mandate
Created to probe anomalous flood-control efforts, the ICI is charged with hearings, testimony, and evidence collection related to infrastructure projects. While it has subpoena powers, it lacks prosecution and contempt authority, a gap that HB 4453 seeks to fill. The debate touches on broader questions of oversight, transparency, and the balance of power among government branches when addressing critical public works.
As the discussion unfolds, the public will be watching whether Congress can align the ICI’s powers with its investigative responsibilities, and whether urgent certification will translate into real reforms in how flood-control projects are monitored and remedied.
