Powell and Phillipson at the Labour conference hustings
As Labour’s annual conference edges toward its closing speeches, the party finds itself debating not just public policy but the leadership dynamics that could shape its path for years. The two candidates vying for the deputy leadership, Lucy Powell and Bridget Phillipson, used the hustings to frame a stark choice for members: unity and bold governance, or division that could leave Labour on the road to opposition.
Powell’s shop-steward ethos and the point of difference
Powell has positioned herself as an independent voice for members—a practical, on-the-ground debater who has described herself as a “shop steward” for Labour’s ranks. After a reshuffle last month, she argues that the party needs stronger connection with activists and communities, not a stifled critique from the sideline. Her stance emphasizes conversation and accountability, with a belief that the party must stay united while tackling difficult issues head-on.
Phillipson’s warning: division and disunity as a political risk
Phillipson, widely viewed as Keir Starmer’s preferred deputy, countered Powell by warning that a Powell victory could usher in “division and disunity” that distracts from governing. She framed the election itself as a clear choice about the kind of change Labour wants: “Change is on the ballot at this election. The choice is what kind of change.” Phillipson argued that Labour must be bold and united, with a seat at the cabinet table to push a bolder agenda, or risk being exposed in right-wing press coverage and slipping back into opposition.
What a deputy leadership outcome could mean for Labour’s future
The exchange underscored a broader tension within Labour—the balance between evolving into a confident governing party and avoiding internal fragmentation that could undermine credibility. Powell’s supporters argue that she could help keep the party grounded in grassroots perspectives, while Phillipson’s supporters worry that a Powell win might lead to consternation within party ranks and hinder cohesion at a time when Labour is trying to present a united front to the electorate.
Policy signals and the wider political backdrop
Beyond the leadership question, the conference has seen policy debates that illuminate the current pressures on Labour. Controversies over proposed changes to employment rights, including the idea of charging fees for bringing tribunals, reflect the tension between business interests and workers’ protections that Labour must navigate. Meanwhile, discussions around digital ID schemes and how international human rights conventions are interpreted highlight the party’s challenge to balance security, civil liberties, and public opinion. These policy threads are not ancillary; they will influence how a future deputy leader is judged on day one of any new government, and how effectively Labour can unite different wings of the party around a practical, bold platform.
Closing questions for Labour members
As speeches wrap, the central question remains: which candidate can best translate Labour’s reform ambitions into credible, united government action? Powell argues for an inclusive approach that engages communities and frontline voices, while Phillipson insists on a disciplined, authoritative leadership that can deliver a more ambitious reform agenda without tearing the party apart. The answer, many delegates suggest, will shape not only the deputy leadership contest but Labour’s appeal ahead of future elections.
The path forward
The conference is a mirror held up to Labour’s ambitions and challenges. The next deputy leader—whether Powell or Phillipson—will be judged not only on policy positions but on the ability to keep the party together, to argue clearly for reform, and to translate momentum into governance that resonates with voters. For now, the mood is about clarity of purpose, and a cautious optimism that Labour can turn its current momentum into a compelling plan for government without tearing itself apart.