Introduction
In a recent press briefing, Deputy Speaker Raghurama Krishnam Raju raised significant questions regarding YS Jagan Mohan Reddy’s understanding of the assembly rules. This came in light of the ongoing discussions about the consequences of absenteeism in the legislative assembly.
Assembly Rules on Absenteeism
According to Raghurama, any assembly member failing to attend sessions for a continuous period of 60 days without prior permission from the Speaker may face disqualification. He emphasized that this provision is clearly stated in the Constitution under Article 190(4) and the assembly’s regulations in Clause 187(2). “Doesn’t someone who has served as Chief Minister and is also a leader of the opposition know this?” he questioned, highlighting the need for adherence to established rules.
Clarity on Rules
Raghurama also pointed out that the assembly rules are easily accessible online, encouraging all members, especially those from the YSR Congress Party (YSRCP), to review them. He stated, “If they examine these rules, it will become clear who is misleading whom.” His comments underscore the importance of legislative decorum and the responsibilities that come with being an elected official.
Reactions from YSRCP Members
Following Raghurama’s statements, Home Minister Vangalapudi Anitha critiqued the notion that opposition status could be handed out whimsically. She commented that the opposition’s role is not like a mere reward that can be claimed by throwing tantrums. “The people are the ones who decide this, not through demands, but through their votes in elections,” Anitha stated, clarifying the gravity and responsibility tied to legislative positions.
The Importance of Participation
Raghurama further elaborated that adequate time must be allotted to opposition members based on the strength of their parties during assembly sessions. He expressed frustration over the continued absence of some YSRCP members when questions were being posed during sessions. “If they engage respectfully, they may find themselves granted more time to speak,” he suggested, advocating for a more collaborative approach in legislative discourse.
Warnings Against Non-Participation
As discussions continued, Senior TDP leader Y. Ramakrishna pointed out that any plans by Jagan to boycott assembly sessions could indeed lead him to disqualification under the relevant provisions of the Constitution. He noted that the questions regarding disqualification are not merely a matter of opinion but rooted in solid legal standing as stated in Articles 188 and 190(4).
Conclusion
The ongoing discourse between Raghurama Krishnam Raju and YS Jagan highlights the critical need for understanding and complying with legislative rules. As the assembly continues its sessions, it is imperative for all members to participate actively and uphold the integrity of the legislative process. The implications of absenteeism not only affect individual members but also the legislative body’s effectiveness as a whole.
