Categories: Politics & Law

Indonesia’s Counter-Disinformation Bill: In Discourse, Not Drafted Yet

Indonesia’s Counter-Disinformation Bill: In Discourse, Not Drafted Yet

Overview: What’s Happening with Indonesia’s Counter-Disinformation Bill

Indonesia’s government has clarified that the proposed Draft Law on Countering Disinformation and Foreign Propaganda is still in the discussion phase and has not been formally drafted. This statement comes amid ongoing public debate and concerns about how laws aimed at countering misinformation could impact freedom of expression and information sharing in the world’s fourth most populous nation.

The Palace’s Position: A Conversation, Not a Contract

According to statements from the State Secretary’s Office, the matter remains a discussion item among policymakers. Prasetyo Hadi, a government official cited in recent briefings, emphasized that there is no final draft or legislative text ready for review. The clarification underscores the government’s preference for careful, consultative processes before any formal legislation is filed with Parliament.

Why the Draft Law Is Controversial

Discussions around countering disinformation often hinge on a balance between safeguarding national security and protecting civil liberties. Proponents argue that the bill would provide authorities with a framework to curb foreign propaganda and disruptive misinformation campaigns that target Indonesia’s political processes and social cohesion. Critics, however, warn of potential overreach, fearing that vague provisions could be used to suppress dissent or constrain legitimate journalism and public discourse.

Public Debate and Civil Society Input

As the discourse continues, various stakeholders—including journalists, researchers, digital rights advocates, and political analysts—are weighing in. The key questions center on how the law would define “disinformation,” what platforms would be responsible for moderation, and what due process protections would exist for citizens accused of spreading false information. Transparent consultations and clear, narrow definitions are often highlighted as essential to prevent abuse and preserve a free, open information environment.

International Context and Domestic Security

Indonesia faces a complex security landscape, where disinformation can influence elections, public health responses, and social stability. The government’s cautious approach reflects a broader trend in several countries: seeking legal tools to counter foreign propaganda while also safeguarding freedom of expression and press freedom. Observers note that any eventual law would need robust oversight mechanisms, clear jurisdiction, and well-defined penalties to prevent misuse.

What Comes Next for the Legislation Process

With no formal draft yet, the process could involve multiple rounds of consultations with lawmakers, experts, and civil society groups. The government may publish an official white paper or discussion paper to outline objectives, scope, and potential indicators of disinformation. After sufficient input, a formal draft would move through Parliament, which could lead to amendments, committee reviews, and public hearings before any bill becomes law.

Implications for Media, Tech Platforms, and Citizens

Any future statute would likely affect media organizations, social media platforms, and internet users. Stakeholders anticipate debates over jurisdiction—whether provisions apply to foreign actors and domestic entities alike—and whether enforcement would rely on administrative measures, criminal penalties, or civil remedies. For journalists and researchers, a central concern is maintaining analytical rigor and the ability to report on misinformation without fear of legal retaliation.

Conclusion: A Law in the Making

At this stage, Indonesia’s counter-disinformation initiative remains a topic of discussion rather than a formal legislative proposal. The government’s reiteration that no draft has been produced signals a cautious approach to policy development—one that prioritizes inclusive dialogue and careful drafting. As public input grows, observers will be watching to see how the policy design balances national security needs with the rights to information and expression that underpin Indonesia’s vibrant media landscape.