Categories: World News / Geopolitics

Why China Is Holding Military Drills Around Taiwan—and the History Behind It

Why China Is Holding Military Drills Around Taiwan—and the History Behind It

Understanding the current drills

China’s decision to bring serious firepower to bear for recent military drills around Taiwan reflects a long-standing strategy rather than a single incident. The exercises come amid rising cross-strait tensions and are widely interpreted as a message about Beijing’s stance on Taiwan’s political status, its international partnerships, and the red lines Beijing has drawn for any perceived moves toward formal independence.

Beijing views Taiwan as a part of its territory and has repeatedly warned against steps toward independence or foreign power influence on the island. In response, Chinese forces have conducted a mix of live-fire drills, air and sea sorties, and maritime blockades or pacing maneuvers designed to test the island’s defenses and to demonstrate the PRC’s willingness to escalate if necessary. The drills also serve as a rehearsal for potential larger-scale operations and are closely watched by regional neighbors and global powers alike.

The historical backdrop

The relationship between China and Taiwan stretches back to the Chinese civil war and the eventual retreat of the Republic of China government to the island in 1949. The two sides have since grown apart politically, but Beijing has consistently refused to renounce the use of force to resolve Taiwan’s status if peaceful steps fail. Over the decades, Taiwan’s leadership has pursued broader international recognition and participation in global institutions, while maintaining a robust defense and cultivating informal security ties with other countries.

The late 20th century saw two pivotal moments that still shape today’s posture. The 1995-1996 Taiwan Strait Crisis involved a series of Chinese missile tests and military exercises in the strait after Taiwan’s first direct presidential election, underscoring Beijing’s willingness to escalate to deter moves toward formal independence. Since then, Taiwan’s democratically elected government has continued to navigate its own security needs in a world where major powers weigh their responses to any change in cross-strait dynamics.

What drives Beijing’s approach today?

Several factors converge in the current drills. First, the leadership in Beijing emphasizes sovereignty and territorial integrity as core interests. Second, Taiwan’s interactions with international partners, including arms sales and high-level diplomacy with allies, are seen as encroachments on what China regards as a domestic affair. Third, regional security dynamics—especially U.S. presence and defense commitments in the Asia-Pacific—frame the drills as both a deterrent and a signal to potential partners or adversaries about China’s readiness to defend its chosen path.

Near-term objectives for Beijing include signaling resolve, testing the operational readiness of its forces, and pressuring Taiwan to avoid actions that could pivot the status quo toward a formal change in governance. The exercises also act as a barometer for regional responses, helping Beijing calibrate its tactics, political messaging, and diplomatic outreach.

What observers look for next

Analysts watch so-called “red lines” in bilateral talks, the scale and scope of any new exercises, and how cross-strait dialogue evolves. A key question is whether regional powers will push for de-escalation or engage in parallel strategic moves—whether diplomatic efforts, economic signals, or increased defense cooperation with Taiwan. The broader international context—trade dependencies, alliance dynamics, and broader geopolitical competition—will shape how the drills influence security calculations in the Asia-Pacific region.

Ultimately, the drills symbolize a long arc of history: ambitions over Taiwan’s status, the memory of past crises, and the ongoing negotiation of identity, sovereignty, and security in a region where history and modern strategy collide. For Taiwan, the challenge remains the same: deter aggression while seeking greater international space and maintaining resilience in the face of persistent pressure.