Controversy erupts as Rajamouli faces backlash
Acclaimed filmmaker S.S. Rajamouli is at the center of a political and religious storm following reports that he allegedly said, “I don’t believe in Hanuman,” during a film industry event in Varanasi. The remarks, attributed to the director amid a technical glitch at a program described by organizers as Globetrotter, have sparked sharp criticism from Hindu groups and prompted at least one police complaint. The incident has quickly become a flashpoint in a broader public debate about religious symbols in Indian cinema.
What happened, and what’s confirmed
According to witnesses quoted in local media, the comment surfaced during a moment of procedural confusion at the event. While the exact sequence of events remains disputed, organizers and attendees say the remark was spoken in a casual, off-the-cuff manner. Critics argue that the statement dismisses a central Hindu deity, while supporters of Rajamouli insist the filmmaker’s remarks were taken out of context and should not be interpreted as a stance on faith or devotion.
Official responses and investigations
In the immediate aftermath, a complaint was filed with police by a group alleging hurt Hindu sentiments. Local authorities have said they will review the matter in line with existing laws on religious sentiments and public order. At the time of this report, there has been no formal statement from Rajamouli or his production team, and his representatives have not publicly commented on the complaint or the allegations.
The larger context: faith, art, and public discourse
Rajamouli’s films, including the epic franchises that have earned him international attention, have repeatedly touched on themes that resonate with diverse Indian audiences. Critics warn that comments touching on religious beliefs can become polarizing, especially when delivered in high-profile settings with broad media coverage. Advocates for free expression say artists should be allowed to speak their minds, while others argue that remarks about sacred figures deserve careful consideration given their potential impact on social harmony.
What’s at stake for the industry
The incident raises questions about accountability for prominent figures in Indian cinema. Public perception, sponsorship, and collaboration with filmmakers can be affected by controversial statements. Industry insiders note that actors, directors, and producers increasingly navigate a charged environment where cultural sensitivity, political expectations, and creative freedom intersect.
What audiences should expect next
As investigations proceed, observers expect a range of responses—from formal clarifications by Rajamouli to possible social-media statements addressing the controversy. Fans of the director may urge restraint and emphasize the need to judge artistic work separately from personal beliefs, while critics may demand an explicit stance on faith-related issues from figureheads who command wide audiences.
Bottom line
The Varanasi incident has thrust SS Rajamouli into a public debate about religion, expression, and responsibility. Whether this will translate into sustained fallout or a swift cooling-off remains uncertain, but the episode highlights the potent role public figures play in shaping conversations around faith and culture in India today.
