Categories: Technology & Safety

New Law Could Tackle AI-Generated Child Abuse at Source, Warns Watchdog

New Law Could Tackle AI-Generated Child Abuse at Source, Warns Watchdog

Overview: A shift in strategy to fight AI-generated abuse

A proposed law could change the way authorities and technology companies handle AI-generated child sexual abuse material (CSAM) by targeting the problem at its source. The initiative comes after growing concerns that synthetic content created by artificial intelligence can be easier to produce and disseminate, potentially normalizing disturbing material and putting children at ongoing risk. The new framework would empower key players—most notably the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) and AI developers themselves—to test and refine safety measures before harms occur.

What the new powers could look like

Under the proposal, watchdog groups with a proven mandate to protect children online would receive enhanced authority to evaluate and tighten content controls. For the IWF, this could mean expanded access to algorithms and datasets used to detect illegal imagery, enabling faster identification and removal of harmful content. AI developers could gain a formal role in assessing the resilience of their models to produce or propagate abusive material and in implementing safeguards that reduce risk without stifling innovation.

Experts say this source-to-solution approach could close a worrying gap where AI-synthesized images or videos slip through existing filters. By testing workflows at the design and deployment stages, the industry could prevent problematic outputs before they reach the public internet. The policy also envisions clearer accountability for platforms, researchers, and product teams involved in creating or distributing AI-generated content.

Why this matters for children online

AI-generated CSAM poses a unique challenge because it can blend realism with fiction, potentially lowering barriers to production and circulation. Proponents of the law argue that acting at the source—not just after material appears on a platform—offers the best chance to disrupt criminal networks and reduce the exposure of young people to this harmful content. The measure would align with broader child protection goals by improving detection, rapid response, and the ethical governance of AI tools used in content creation.

Critics, however, warn of potential trade-offs. They emphasize the need to balance safety with civil liberties, ensuring that enhanced testing and monitoring do not impede legitimate research or free expression. The debate also highlights the importance of robust transparency, data protection, and independent oversight to prevent overreach and ensure proportional responses to risk.

Implications for tech and policy

For AI developers, the proposed law could set new expectations around responsible model training, data handling, and ongoing risk assessments. Companies may need to publish clearer safety statements and demonstrate how their safeguards perform under varied real-world conditions. Platforms hosting user-generated content could face strengthened duties to cooperate with IWF and other authorities, including sharing insights about harmful patterns detected by AI systems.

Regulators would likely require a framework for continual improvement—an iterative process that adapts to evolving technologies and tactics used by offenders. This approach can help ensure that as AI tools become more capable, the safety measures surrounding them advance in tandem, reducing the chance that abuse material is generated or distributed with minimal friction for investigators.

What comes next

Lawmakers are weighing stakeholder input, including voices from child protection groups, the tech industry, and privacy advocates. If the bill progresses, it could pave the way for formal pilot programs, followed by phased rollouts that test the feasibility and impact of enhanced testing regimes. The goal remains clear: stronger protection for children, more effective detection of illicit content, and responsible innovation in AI.

Conclusion

The proposed law signals a strategic shift in the fight against AI-generated CSAM, moving preventive measures closer to the source. By enabling the IWF and AI developers to test and reinforce defenses, the policy aims to reduce harm, support rapid responses, and foster a safer online environment for children worldwide.