Categories: Public governance and anti-corruption

OMB’s mandate: Reestablishing the Government’s Moral Authority

OMB’s mandate: Reestablishing the Government’s Moral Authority

Introduction: A pivotal moment for public trust

The appointment of former Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin Remulla as the new Ombudsman arrives at a critical juncture for the Philippines. Fresh revelations of massive graft in public works — spanning ghost projects, inflated costs, and collusive contracts — threaten to erode public faith in government once more. For a nation seeking to uphold transparency and good governance, these disclosures strike at the core of the state’s moral authority.

The Ombudsman’s role: Beyond administration, a moral duty

The Ombudsman’s office stands as the Republic’s last institutional defense against abuses of power. With constitutional independence, it investigates, prosecutes, and disciplines erring officials without fear or favor. The new Ombudsman’s mandate is not merely administrative; it is moral and civic. He must demonstrate that justice serves the public, not the powerful, and that public offices remain servants of citizens, not private interests.

A formidable task: Rebuilding faith amid political complicity

The challenges facing the new Ombudsman are substantial. He inherits an office pressured to act decisively on a growing caseload while also reviving public trust that truth and accountability can prevail in a landscape marred by political entanglements. Ordinary citizens feel the impact: every unbuilt road, unfinished bridge, and delayed drainage project amplifies hardship. When public funds meant for infrastructure are siphoned away, opportunity and dignity are also stolen from communities that rely on timely projects for economic recovery.

A proactive agenda: Close loopholes and protect whistleblowers

The path forward requires swift coordination with the Commission on Audit, the Department of Justice, and Congress to close systemic loopholes that enable graft. Protecting whistleblowers and reforming procurement processes are equally vital to breaking the cycles of corruption that thrive in opaque systems. This reform orientation signals a serious commitment to accountability and to the public interest.

Transparency as a beacon: SALN disclosures and public accountability

The public welcomed the Ombudsman’s decision to publish the Statement of Assets, Liabilities and Net Worth (SALN) for all government officials, including the President and Vice President. This move marks a new era of openness, countering attempts to shield possible graft behind privacy barriers. While data privacy remains essential, the policy demonstrates that transparency can coexist with responsible safeguards, ensuring disclosures are not weaponized for political gain.

Moreover, the plan to reinstate resident Ombudsmen in every government agency promises deeper checks and balances. This presence is a significant improvement over past gaps in oversight and signals a more proactive posture in rooting out corruption at the source. The focus will likely extend to examining allegations of money laundering among senior officials, ensuring that investigations consider both official misconduct and its broader financial networks.

The broader impact: Restoring credibility to the rule of law

The credibility of the Marcos administration and the nation’s international image hinge on the Ombudsman’s independence and resolve. The 2024 Corruption Perceptions Index underscores the work ahead: the Philippines ranks mid-table among ASEAN nations, with tangible room for improvement in governance quality. The Office of the Ombudsman thus bears an enormous responsibility to raise ethical standards in the civil service and demonstrate that public office remains a public trust.

Conclusion: A test of character and governance

If the Ombudsman can assert independence, pursue accountability with audacity, and uphold transparent practices, the country can reclaim public trust in the rule of law. Reestablishing moral authority in governance is not merely about prosecutions; it is about reinforcing a culture where transparency, integrity, and service define public life.