DOJ Pushes Forward with Flood Control Investigation
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is maintaining momentum in its high-stakes probe into alleged corruption in flood control projects, as prosecutors continue to verify statements from individuals seeking protection under the Witness Protection Program (WPP). Office-in-Charge Fredderick Vida, speaking after the DOJ’s flag-raising ceremony, underscored a cautious but persistent approach to building a case—rooted in verified testimonies and solid documentary evidence.
Why the Probe Matters
In recent Senate hearings, investigators highlighted schemes described as license-for-rent and fund diversion involving engineers, local officials, and private contractors. Those revelations catalyzed DOJ coordination with the Office of the Ombudsman and the Commission on Audit (COA) to identify overlapping cases and determine jurisdiction over related transactions. The flood control program, a multibillion-peso initiative, has become a focal point for ensuring accountability in public spending and infrastructure management.
Evidence Under Scrutiny
Vida explained that the DOJ’s verification process is meticulous: statements from cooperating individuals undergo cross-checking with physical and documentary proof, with collaboration from agencies like the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). He noted that charges will be filed only when prosecutors are confident the evidence can withstand judicial scrutiny. “The public can expect that when we file cases, these will be backed by verified evidence and solid witness accounts,” he said, adding that the DOJ will not move forward with weak cases.
Protection of Whistleblowers and Witnesses
A central theme of the DOJ’s approach is safeguarding those who come forward. Vida emphasized that the confidentiality surrounding informants and evidence is essential to maintain the integrity of investigations and the safety of witnesses. He warned against livestreaming interviews, arguing that premature disclosure could allow implicated parties to intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence. “Protecting our witnesses ensures that the truth can stand on its own once we reach the courts,” he stated, reiterating that due process requires careful handling of every statement.
Balance Between Public Right to Know and Due Process
While the public has a right to information about government actions, Vida cautioned that transparency cannot compromise due process. He stressed that the DOJ’s objective is to present a clear, legally sound case backed by credible testimony at the proper forum—the courts—not through sensationalized disclosures. The department is navigating a delicate balance: providing accountability without exposing witnesses to danger or allowing deteriorating defense strategies by those accused of wrongdoing.
What’s Next for the Investigation
Vida indicated that once fact-finding concludes and corroborated evidence is assembled, the DOJ will proceed decisively. The department continues to work closely with relevant agencies to corroborate testimonies with physical and documentary proof, aiming to file charges only when the evidence meets judicial standards. The ongoing probe is part of a broader push for transparency and reform in flood control projects and related public works.
A Call for Responsible Reporting
As the DOJ advances its investigation, officials reiterated the importance of accurate, responsible reporting. Vida asked the public and media to recognize the necessity of protecting witnesses while ensuring that accountability remains grounded in facts and law. He stressed that the ultimate goal is to uncover the truth and deliver justice through due process, safeguarding the integrity of the programs that affect millions of citizens’ lives.