De Lima questions ICI’s livestream stance amid calls for transparency
Rep. Leila de Lima criticized the Independent Commission for Infrastructure (ICI) for its persistent refusal to livestream its hearings, suggesting that the commission’s independence should not shield it from public accountability. In a statement issued on Saturday, Oct. 11, the Mamamayang Liberal (ML) Party-list lawmaker asked whether the decision reflects the President’s wishes, highlighting the importance of openness when the body reviews matters of national interest.
What independence should mean in this context
De Lima argued that an “independent” commission does not equate to allowing for unilateral actions or a lack of transparency. “If we say independent commission, it doesn’t mean they will go on their own. Why are they so firm? Is that what the President wants?” she said, underscoring her concern that the public’s right to know is being curtailed by procedural secrecy.
Her comments come after the ICI repeatedly rejected calls to livestream its proceedings, with officials arguing that not all information discussed in hearings is verified or ready for public dissemination. The vice chair pointed out that transparency is essential to dispel fears of a cover-up or whitewash, especially as the commission handles matters tied to infrastructure and public accountability.
Context: EO No. 94 and the push for stronger oversight
De Lima noted early concerns about Executive Order No. 94, which established the ICI, suggesting that the framework could be strengthened to prevent potential gaps between deliberations and public trust. She argued that a fact-finding body dealing with high-stakes issues should be transparent, not only to satisfy public curiosity but to reassure citizens that inquiries are fair and thorough.
The timing matters: suspended inquiries and stalled hearings
With the House Infra Committee’s joint inquiry suspended and no Senate Blue Ribbon Committee hearing scheduled, De Lima emphasized that Filipinos are eager to know the status and pacing of the investigation. The absence of live access to proceedings has intensified public interest, amplifying calls for timely updates on progress and findings.
What transparency could unlock
De Lima argued that livestreaming hearings would serve as a tool to build trust and reduce speculation. A public-facing process helps ensure that findings are understood, verified, and free from insinuations of political maneuvering. She stressed that transparency is a foundational element of good governance, especially when a commission’s work influences infrastructure policy and the allocation of public resources.
Beyond transparency: the call for stronger powers
In addition to urging livestreams, De Lima asserted that ICI needs greater authority to perform its mandate effectively. She referenced House Bill No. 4453, which co-authors say would enhance the commission’s powers. The congresswoman pressed for quicker action from the House leadership and questioned why the President has not certified the bill as urgent.
Looking ahead: accountability and public confidence
As public interest in infrastructure and governance grows, De Lima’s remarks spotlight a central debate: how to balance independence with accountability. For proponents of stronger oversight, the debate hinges on providing verifiable, timely information to citizens while preserving the commission’s ability to conduct thorough inquiries.
Ultimately, De Lima’s call to livestream hearings and back stronger legislative tools signals a broader demand for transparency in public institutions. Whether the ICI accepts this challenge may shape public trust for years to come, and could set a precedent for how similar bodies engage with the people they serve.
