Overview: A Misrouted Notification During a Critical Outage
Optus faced intense scrutiny after it sent warnings about a September 18 outage to an incorrect, unmonitored Department of Communications email address. In a hearing before the Senate estimates committee, department officials confirmed the two emails were delivered seven minutes apart to a defunct inbox, with no monitoring in place to flag the messages. The incident highlights ongoing concerns about how telcos notify government agencies during emergencies and raises questions about the reliability of established channels.
The Timeline and Key Players
According to deputy secretary James Chisholm, notification is only complete when it reaches the right recipient. “I would not consider notification complete if it’s sent to the wrong place. So notification occurs when it is given to the right recipient. In this case, it was not,” he told the committee. Kathleen Silleri, assistant secretary of the emergency communications section, noted that Optus had been using the correct email address for other outages, suggesting a deviation occurred specifically on this occasion.
Unread Messages and System Gaps
Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young pressed the department on why the emails remained unread for more than 24 hours. Officials confirmed the inbox under the defunct address was not monitored, and the department only learned of Optus’s communications after ACMA alerted them on September 19. The discrepancy between the party line—claims that Optus had notified the department—and the reality of unread emails created a sense of contrived certainty in the department’s opening statements.
Regulator Involvement and Accountability
Chisholm acknowledged a delay in recognizing the Optus notice, explaining that the department did not receive a timely notification by its own channels and instead relied on ACMA’s intervention. Senator Hanson-Young argued that the department’s statements suggested a notification was received, while the agency’s own records indicated otherwise. The episode underscores tensions between regulators and service providers over the reliability of emergency communications and the adequacy of official channels.
What Went Wrong?
The core issue appears to be that Optus sent the alert to a wrong, defunct mailbox that is explicitly not intended for emergencies notifications. The department’s response protocol hinges on immediate access to the right inbox, a condition that did not hold in this case. Officials maintained that the correct address has been used successfully in the past, placing the current failure squarely on the misdirection of the alert.
Implications for Telecommunications and Public Safety
Public safety depends on timely, reliable notices to emergency agencies. When outage alerts fail to reach the proper channels, the potential for delayed incident response grows, with real-world consequences for civilians who rely on Triple Zero for urgent help. The hearing will likely prompt a closer scrutiny of telco notification procedures and the governance around which channels are deemed authoritative for crisis communication.
What’s Next?
Lawmakers are expected to demand clarifications from Optus and the department on preventive measures, including explicit verification steps for sending government alerts, auditing of contact lists, and perhaps redundancies to avoid single points of failure like a defunct inbox. The broader takeaway is a push for more robust, monitored, and auditable emergency communications between telcos and government agencies.
Public Interest and Industry Standards
As the Senate investigates the incident, there is heightened interest in whether industry-wide standards for emergency notification should be strengthened. Ensuring that critical alerts land in active, monitored inboxes is essential for reducing response times and safeguarding lives during future outages.
Cut through the noise of federal politics with news, views and expert analysis. Subscribers can sign up to our weekly Inside Politics newsletter.
