ABC’s Legal Bill in Lattouf Matter Surges Beyond $2.5 Million
The Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC) has disclosed that external costs tied to defending journalist Antoinette Lattouf in a high-profile case have surpassed $2.5 million, with the final tally still in flux as the organisation navigates potential further costs. The revelation came during Senate estimates, where managing director Hugh Marks outlined the mounting expenses tied to the legal action.
What Happened and Why It Went to Court
Federal Court Justice Darryl Rangiah previously ruled that the ABC breached the Fair Work Act by terminating Lattouf’s employment during a five‑day radio presenting contract on Sydney radio in December 2023. The decision cited that the dismissal occurred in part to appease pro-Israel lobby groups and because Lattouf held a political opinion opposing the Israeli military campaign in Gaza. As a consequence, Lattouf was awarded damages, including $150,000 for breach of the Fair Work Act and $70,000 for non-economic loss.
Costs and the Financial Impact on the ABC
Mr. Marks testified that the external costs—fees paid to lawyers and consultants outside the ABC—have risen as the case progressed. “My estimate was, at the time of the trial, that it was going to be many millions of dollars,” he said, noting that there are still some final accounts to come and the possibility of a further costs hearing. “I know our external costs at this point, of all of the components of that, are now more than $2.5 million.”
The ABC’s earlier estimate in February had placed external costs at about $1.1 million. While internal costs are harder to gauge, Marks emphasized that extensive time and effort from many staff members contributed to the overall expenditure. He described the situation as not a good reflection on the organisation, adding that it would have been preferable to avoid the dispute entirely.
Lessons and Reflections
Asked about takeaways from the Lattouf case, Marks highlighted a focus on staying calm under pressure, adhering to internal processes, and understanding decision-making authority within the organisation. He acknowledged several failings in the handling of the matter and stressed that the lessons should serve as a reminder of the high standards expected in all environments.
What Comes Next?
With the court order and damages in place, the ABC faces ongoing considerations regarding costs. The organisation did not indicate a fixed ceiling on future payments, acknowledging that bills may continue to accumulate depending on the outcome of any outstanding hearings or negotiations. The public and policymakers will likely watch closely as more details emerge about the true total cost of the litigation to the broadcaster and the broader implications for media accountability and workplace practices.
Impact on Public Perception
Beyond the financial figures, the case has raised questions about editorial independence, the influence of external pressures on media decisions, and how organisations respond to internal disputes that become highly public. Lattouf’s post on social media after the ruling framed the matter as a broader debate about taxpayer money and accountability, underscoring the ongoing public interest in how media institutions handle workplace disputes and legal challenges.
