Categories: Health and Medical Litigation

Delayed Diagnosis and Damaged Diagnosis: The Barwon Health Necrotising Fasciitis Case

Delayed Diagnosis and Damaged Diagnosis: The Barwon Health Necrotising Fasciitis Case

Overview: A life-altering medical delay

A Victorian couple has joined a legal action against Barwon Health, the operator of University Hospital Geelong, after their diagnosis of a rare, fast-moving infection—necrotising fasciitis—was reportedly delayed. The case highlights how a seemingly minor injury can escalate into a life-threatening medical emergency when early signs are missed and timely treatment is not delivered.

The incident and progression

In April 2021, a wooden toy clock struck a man’s face, leaving a small cut above the left eye. A general practitioner treated the wound with cleaning and glue, and the patient departed with a sore head but few expectations of what lay ahead. That night, swelling progressed rapidly, transforming a minor injury into a potential catastrophe. By the time the patient arrived at University Hospital Geelong the next day, family members say staff did not recognise the warning signs of a spreading infection.

Why this matters: necrotising fasciitis is dangerous

Necrotising fasciitis is a rare but deadly bacterial infection that can devastate skin and underlying tissues. It spreads quickly and can trigger a systemic inflammatory response, or sepsis, if not identified and treated promptly. Specialists interviewed for the case note that the infection is especially dangerous when it involves the face and neck, where it can threaten the eyes and brain.

Care trajectory and alleged missteps

The family asserts a pattern of missed opportunities to suspect or treat the infection sooner. According to interviews, a nurse was told the patient was not infected and staff reportedly insisted the wound did not show signs of infection. Pain management was provided with opioids, while antibiotics were not initiated for approximately 24 hours. It was not until a medical consultant ophthalmologist was consulted that the possibility of necrotising fasciitis was considered, and the patient was transferred to a more capable centre for urgent surgery in Melbourne.

Medical actions and consequences

Surgeons removed dead tissue and performed facial reconstruction after the patient was stabilised. The infection had caused extensive tissue damage, and the patient subsequently lost a left eye. A skin graft and reconstructive work followed, but the injury permanently altered the patient’s appearance and daily life. The couple’s legal team contends that earlier recognition and intervention could have reduced the severity of the outcome.

Legal action and ongoing review

Barwon Health has commissioned an internal review, which identified three moments where staff might have suspected an infection earlier. The review notes barriers such as the perception that the initial injury was not contaminated and the rarity of necrotising fasciitis. The couple’s attorney argues that more rapid action could have changed the trajectory of the patient’s recovery and quality of life.

Impact on daily life and future outlook

For the patient, the consequences extend beyond physical scars. Perceptual changes, reduced peripheral vision, and the practical challenges of returning to work as a motorcycle mechanic underscore the lasting impact. The spouse describes ongoing emotional strain as the family navigates medical costs, treatment responsibilities, and the aftermath of a life-altering event.

The broader takeaway

This case underscores the critical need for clinicians to recognise potential infections quickly, especially when the initial injury appears minor. Necrotising fasciitis demands swift antibiotic therapy and surgical assessment in appropriate settings to prevent rapid deterioration. It also highlights how medical disputes turn on timing, clinical judgment, and communication between healthcare teams and patients’ families.

Looking ahead

As the legal process unfolds, healthcare providers and patients alike may reflect on the importance of early warning signs, timely referrals, and transparent communication. Improved triage protocols and rapid access to specialist review can be essential in reducing the risk of devastating outcomes in similar cases.