Categories: Energy Policy

Pangasinan Town Open to Hosting Nuclear Power Plant Under New PhilAtom Law

Pangasinan Town Open to Hosting Nuclear Power Plant Under New PhilAtom Law

Overview: Labradorhunts for a modern energy future

In the Philippines’ push toward a diversified energy mix, Labrador, a town in Pangasinan, has signaled openness to hosting a nuclear power facility. The announcement comes in the wake of Republic Act 12305, known as the Philippine National Nuclear Energy Safety Act or the PhilAtom Law, which lays down the regulatory framework for safe and responsible use of nuclear energy in the country.

What the PhilAtom Law changes

The law creates an independent regulatory body, the Philippine Atomic Energy Regulatory and Safety Authority (PhilATOM), tasked with overseeing all nuclear and radiation activities. Its role is to ensure compliance with the highest international safety standards established by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). As officials explain, the regulator will handle licensing through two stages: a license to construct and a license to operate, ensuring that construction, site selection, operation, and waste management all meet stringent safety requirements.

Local government stance

Mayor Noel Uson and Vice Mayor Melchora Yaneza of Labrador voiced strong support for considering nuclear energy as part of the town’s future. The leadership stressed that safety, security, and safeguards are central to any discussions about hosting a nuclear power plant. Yaneza underscored the importance of robust security measures to manage risks associated with nuclear technology, noting these are among the town’s key considerations.

Public sentiment and policy implications

The discourse in Labrador reflects a broader national debate on how to secure affordable, reliable electricity while safeguarding public health and the environment. Reports indicate that a significant portion of Labrador residents support the idea of a nuclear facility in exchange for potential benefits, including access to free electricity, illustrating a potential social license for future energy projects. Experts, however, caution that public acceptance must be earned through transparent safety assurances and clear safeguards.

Expert perspective on safety and implementation

Dr. Carlo Arcilla, director of the Philippine Nuclear Research Institute, highlighted that PhilATOM’s creation is a pivotal step toward establishing a credible regulatory culture. He explained that the regulator’s core mandate is to verify that a site is safe, that construction adheres to safety standards, and that operations and waste management are conducted with maximum precaution. Arcilla also emphasized the need to prevent misuse of nuclear materials for terrorists or weapon manufacturing, pointing to established international best practices as benchmarks.

Economic and national implications

Rep. Mark Cojuangco, who championed the PhilAtom Law, framed nuclear energy as a potential source of cheaper, cleaner, and more reliable electricity. He argued that nuclear power could reduce coal imports, boost energy independence, create jobs, and potentially curb poverty through energy-driven growth. While the law is a foundational step, it will ultimately rely on rigorous regulatory oversight and transparent stakeholder engagement to translate policy into tangible benefits.

What comes next for Labrador and beyond

With the PhilAtom Law in place, municipalities like Labrador may be positioned to participate in feasibility studies, environmental assessments, and community consultations. The pathway to hosting a nuclear power plant hinges on meeting the stringent criteria set by PhilATOM and gaining public trust through ongoing safety demonstrations. As the country strengthens its nuclear governance, Labrador’s openness could serve as a case study in how local governments balance energy needs with safety imperatives.