Overview: A Controversial Legal Turn in Mardan
The Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (K-P) government has moved to withdraw a set of cases linked to the May 9 incident described as vandalism and firing, with official sources confirming the cabinet’s approval for withdrawal. Advocate General Shah Faisal said the decision follows assessments that the cases were built on insufficient evidence and flawed investigations, and were largely viewed as political victimisation. This development marks a significant shift in the province’s handling of the crackdown that followed the PTI-related protests last year.
Why the Cases Are Being Withdrawn
According to the Advocate General, the cases in question did not meet the standards of evidence required for sustained prosecutions. Investigations were described as flawed, and the proceedings were widely criticised as instruments of political pressure rather than legitimate legal action. Government insiders noted that continuing with these cases would divert administrative resources and time from more pressing matters, arguing that withdrawal serves the interests of good governance.
Official Steps and Oversight
Following the cabinet’s approval, the Home Department was instructed to begin the formal withdrawal process. The government has also appointed a special prosecutor to oversee related legal proceedings. Advocate Muhammad Inaam Yousafzai will supervise the withdrawal process, ensuring that the move complies with legal standards and due process.
Next Legal Milestones
The court has scheduled a hearing for October 15, which will provide a procedural checkpoint for the withdrawal. While withdrawals are intended to close a chapter, the court’s proceedings will determine whether additional administrative steps or related actions are required.
Context: May 9, 2023 Protests in the Province
On May 9, 2023, reports emerged of protests and clashes across Pakistan as PTI lawmakers and supporters reportedly attacked military installations following party chairman Imran Khan’s arrest by paramilitary Rangers. In the wake of those events, the government launched a broad crackdown against the former ruling party, registering FIRs against thousands of individuals under anti-terrorism charges. The crackdown extended across multiple districts, including Peshawar, Mardan, Mohmand, and Khyber, and led to an array of legal actions, including the prosecution and, in some cases, referrals to military courts.
Current State and Implications
As of now, a total of 29 cases connected to the May 9 incidents have been dismissed by the courts, including the Mardan case. The withdrawal signals a potential shift in how the provincial government balances security interests with civil liberties and political dynamics. Observers note that the move could reduce political tensions in the short term, though it may also raise questions about the accountability mechanisms used in the crackdown period.
What This Means for Citizens and the Legal System
For residents of Mardan and the wider K-P region, the withdrawal may ease a portion of the ongoing legal and administrative strain. It also raises broader questions about evidence standards, the integrity of initial investigations, and the long-term approach to addressing unrest and political dissent. Legal experts emphasize the importance of ensuring that future cases are built on robust evidence and fair investigations to uphold public trust in the judicial process.
Conclusion
The cabinet’s decision to withdraw May 9-related cases in Mardan, supported by a dedicated special prosecutor, reflects a calculated administrative move designed to focus resources where they are most needed while avoiding politically charged prosecutions without solid evidentiary footing. The October 15 hearing will be a key moment to observe how the withdrawal unfolds within the province’s legal framework.
