Third DOJ Visit Signals Ongoing Case Build-Up
Former Bulacan first district assistant engineers Brice Hernandez and Jaypee Mendoza arrived at the Department of Justice on Thursday for their third visit as prosecutors continue to build the case surrounding anomalous flood control projects. The ongoing interactions highlight the persistence of the investigation into irregularities tied to flood-control initiatives and related contracts.
Provisional Acceptance into the Witness Protection Program
Both men are currently under provisional acceptance into the Witness Protection Program (WPP), but they are not yet designated as state witnesses. This status indicates a protective layer while authorities assess potential cooperation and the credibility of statements that could be used in future proceedings.
Hernandez’s Earlier Disclosure
Hernandez previously gave information stored on his computer to the DOJ. Officials have clarified that the data file contains names of lawmakers who may be linked to the anomalous flood-control projects. The disclosure did not include names of senators, with officials noting that the individuals named are lawmakers at other levels of government.
Context and What It Means for the Case
The probe into flood-control projects has drawn attention to procurement processes and project implementation, raising questions about oversight, compliance with public bidding rules, and the possibility of outside influence. Investigators are evaluating how contracts were awarded, what criteria guided decisions, and whether proper channels were observed in the execution of flood-control infrastructure.
Next Steps for Hernandez, Mendoza, and the DOJ
With three visits already logged, authorities say the case-build remains active. Prosecutors are expected to interview additional witnesses and scrutinize materials related to Hernandez’s computer data, among other leads. Even as Hernandez and Mendoza benefit from WPP protection, any move toward formal state-witness testimony would depend on further corroborating evidence and a separate review. The DOJ has not set a timetable for testimonies or release of the names linked to the projects.
Local Implications
For residents of Bulacan and other affected communities, the investigation underscores concerns about how flood-control projects are planned and executed, and whether oversight mechanisms were sufficient to prevent irregularities. As authorities advance their inquiries, the public awaits clearer statements about accountability and the steps underway to ensure responsible handling of public funds in critical infrastructure projects.
