Categories: World News - Ukraine War

IAEA Warns Diesel Could Last Ten Days at Zaporizhzhia NPP Amid Outage

IAEA Warns Diesel Could Last Ten Days at Zaporizhzhia NPP Amid Outage

EU’s Largest Nuclear Plant Under Strain as Power Keeps Failing

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has raised alarm over the situation at Europe’s largest nuclear power plant, Zaporizhzhia in southern Ukraine. With external power cut for more than a week, the six reactors at the plant remain shut but still require cooling. The Ukrainian side and the facility’s Moscow-appointed operators say cooling is currently maintained by eight diesel generators, a temporary fix that, by IAEA estimates, could last only about ten days.

IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi spoke from Vienna, noting that the plant has not yet faced an immediate nuclear safety crisis, but emphasized that sustaining cooling without regular power is not a durable arrangement. He said the agency remains in contact with both Russia and Ukraine to secure a return of power to the site and to ensure the cooling systems keep functioning safely. The stark warning underlined the fragility of a situation in which a nuclear facility sits at the mercy of battlefield disruptions and political stalemate.

Why Diesel Power Matters for a Shut-Down Plant

Even though the reactors at Zaporizhzhia are currently offline, cooling remains essential to prevent overheating of spent fuel and reactor internals. The IAEA pointed out that once a power line failed on September 23, the plant depended entirely on backup diesel generators to run cooling pumps and other safety systems. Diesel reserves are limited, and a continuous fuel supply is required if external power cannot be restored promptly. The agency stressed that this is not a “normal” or sustainable state for a nuclear facility, where uninterrupted electricity is the norm and any prolonged outage could raise safety concerns.

What Could Happen If Power Isn’t Restored

Experts warn that the longer cooling relies on emergency diesel, the higher the risk of fuel scarcity, mechanical failure, or fuel delivery disruptions—especially in a region battered by ongoing fighting. The IAEA warned that even a temporary loss of cooling could lead to increased decay heat management challenges, potentially requiring complex procedures and rapid decision-making by plant operators. The agency urged all parties to facilitate rapid repairs to the grid connection and to reestablish Ukrainian control over the facility’s electrical supply.

According to Grossi, the last high-voltage connection between Zaporizhzhia and the wider grid was severed on September 23. With the surrounding combat making repairs hazardous, both Moscow and Kyiv have attributed responsibility to the other side for the disruption. The Ukrainian energy ministry has pressed international partners to exert pressure on Russia to restore power and allow safe access to the site for repairs. Greenpeace has accused Moscow of sabotaging the power link in a bid to hook Zaporizhzhia into the Russian grid, a claim that has intensified the political dimension of the outage.

International Reactions and the Path Forward

Across capitals, the situation has become a litmus test for nuclear safety under war conditions. The IAEA’s understated but urgent briefing has spurred calls for urgent de-escalation and for secure, verifiable steps to get Zaporizhzhia back on Ukrainian control and reconnected to the Ukrainian grid. European and allied governments are weighing how best to support Kyiv in stabilizing the plant’s operations without further escalating tensions in the region.

Analysts say the Zaporizhzhia outage also highlights broader questions about nuclear safety in conflict zones, the responsibilities of occupying forces, and the need for robust international mechanisms to protect civilians and critical infrastructure in times of war.

Context: The War, Energy, and Security

Zaporizhzhia sits at the center of the Ukraine conflict’s energy-security dimension. Beyond the immediate safety concerns, the incident underscores how military actions can directly threaten civilian infrastructure, with consequences that ripple through electricity supply, industrial activity, and daily life in Ukraine and neighboring countries. The IAEA’s latest update serves as a reminder that nuclear safety remains a shared international responsibility, even amid geopolitical crises.