What happened during the incident
A newly released video features former Tamil Nadu minister Senthil Balaji addressing a moment that stirred public debate: reports that slippers were hurled as Vijay performed or spoke about the so‑called ’10 Rupees’ song. The event appears to have occurred during a public address in which the actor-turned-politician was seen speaking from a vehicle, with onlookers and media capturing the scene.
Balaji’s explanation
In his explanation, Balaji counters the implication that the slippers were thrown at him while Vijay spoke about or referenced him. He notes that Vijay spoke for a total of about 19 minutes, and that the most relevant portions come as the speech progressed. Balaji emphasizes that the accusations tie to a particular segment of the address rather than a continuous confrontation, and he suggests the act may have been intended to draw the star’s attention or to pivot the narrative away from issues facing the government.
Timeline highlighted by Balaji
Balaji outlines a precise sequence to support his account. He states that the discussion about him by Vijay occurred around the 16th minute of the address. Regarding the footwear incident, Balaji notes two distinct throws around the 6th minute: the first at roughly 6:05 and a second at about 6:40. He argues these moments were timed to coincide with the speaker’s attention on the crowd rather than to target him personally at the outset of the talk.
Key timestamps cited by Balaji
According to Balaji, the 3-minute mark featured portion of the talk without the focus on him, while the pivotal references and the footwear incident occur in the later minutes. He contends that the incident should be viewed in the context of public discourse on accountability and the broader narrative around government performance, rather than as a calculated attack on a political figure.
Media and political context
The video release invites a broader conversation about media coverage and social media’s role in political events. Critics argue that some narratives prioritize sensational moments—such as a slipper throw—over substantive discussions on governance and policy. Supporters counter that such episodes reflect genuine public anger and a demand for accountability. As the story evolves, observers urge responsible reporting and careful assessment of the timelines to avoid misinterpretation.
What this means for Tamil Nadu politics
Beyond the immediate incident, the exchange highlights how rivalries in Tamil Nadu politics are broadcast to a wide audience. While the slipper episode is dramatic, the underlying questions concern governance, transparency, and media ethics. Analysts say the episode could influence public perception of both Vijay and Senthil Balaji, potentially shaping future political narratives and voter sentiment. As campaigns resume and public appearances continue, watchers will monitor how the discourse evolves and what, if any, actions follow from these claims.
