Langbroek set to seek federal clarity on Trump tariff
Queensland Arts Minister John-Paul Langbroek will again press Canberra for clarity on the Trump administration’s latest tariff proposal affecting the state’s film sector. While acknowledging the renewed threat to impose a 100 per cent tariff on foreign-made films, Langbroek stressed that the local industry is not deterred and remains buoyant amid ongoing trade uncertainty.
Langbroek confirmed he would write to federal Culture and the Arts Minister Tony Burke to obtain a diplomatic explanation, describing the move as a prudent step to understand the scope and potential impact of any policy change. “The local industry continues to be very active, both since May and even as recently as last week, when we had Subversion being filmed with Chris Hemsworth,” Langbroek said on Tuesday, signalling ongoing production activity in Queensland despite the noise around tariffs.
“The local industry is vibrant and very positive about the future—having said that, we would like some clarification.”
Queensland’s film sector: a hub of activity and incentives
The state has positioned itself as a competitive hub for film and television production, using targeted incentives to attract projects and sustain local jobs. Queensland’s approach mirrors a broader national trend where states compete to lure international and domestic productions through tax offsets and grants. The renewed tariff talk underscores why ministers like Langbroek are keen to get precise policy details rather than react to headlines.
Recent weeks have highlighted Queensland’s appeal: notable productions continue to land in the state, reinforcing confidence in a sector that has shown resilience even in uncertain markets. Langbroek cited ongoing activity—mentioning projects such as Subversion—as evidence that Queensland’s studios, crews and facilities remain in demand, contributing to local economies and communities.
What a 100% tariff could mean—and why a measured response matters
A 100 per cent tariff on foreign-produced films could unravel the financial balance that enables Australian productions to compete on the global stage. While the threat has been framed as a rehash of earlier comments, officials emphasize the importance of diplomatic engagement to avoid unintended consequences for Australian jobs and screen culture.
Langbroek’s approach—requesting formal clarification from Tony Burke—reflects a cautious, policy-driven stance. Rather than heighten alarm, the minister is prioritising accuracy in what would be a high-impact decision for Queensland studios, production crews and allied industries across the state.
Industry optimism tempered by policy clarity
Despite the noise around tariffs, the industry’s mood in Queensland remains optimistic. Producers and technicians continue to leverage the state’s diverse locations, skilled workforce and supportive state programs. The ongoing filming activity, including high-profile projects, suggests the sector can weather volatility with clear guidelines and sustained government engagement.
What’s next for Queensland’s screen sector?
The immediate next step is a formal inquiry and response from federal authorities, followed by potential policy adjustments or assurances that help secure long-term planning for local productions. For Langbroek, the priority is transparency and dialogue—ensuring Queensland’s film industry can continue to attract projects, create jobs and contribute to the state’s cultural output, regardless of global tariff rhetoric.
Conclusion: policy clarity as a shield for a thriving industry
As the government seeks clarity on the tariff proposal, Queensland’s film sector remains a dynamic force in the state’s economy and cultural life. The blend of active productions, local incentives and principled federal engagement provides a pragmatic path forward, allowing the industry to grow with confidence while policymakers navigate complex international trade considerations.
